安全

Architecture

Safety by Architecture

Physical interaction between people and robots requires safety to be part of the architecture, not an afterthought. These are development priorities — not claimed as already certified features.

A development approach that treats human control, operational limits, monitoring, safe-state behavior, traceability, and layered safety as…

Physical interaction between people and robots involves real risk.

信頼ページは、組織的コミットメント、ガバナンス、限界を説明します。法的方針、認証、完全な安全・プライバシー・コンプライアンスの保証ではありません。

もっと読む

エグゼクティブサマリー

Safety belongs in the architecture, not as a later slogan.

The Systems Safety Layer documents engineering safeguards.

This page explains development priorities for human-robot interaction.

原則

People must have clear ways to interrupt or override robotic assistance.

Robotic behavior should remain within defined capabilities, environments, and task boundaries.

Layered safety may involve hardware, software, sensors, procedures, and human supervision.

重要な理由

Physical interaction between people and robots involves real risk.

Useful assistance still requires interruption, limits, and oversight.

Trust depends on visible control — not on promising that systems are already certified.

責任

Human control — people must have clear ways to interrupt or override robotic assistance.

Operational limits — behavior should remain within defined capabilities, environments, and task boundaries.

Interaction monitoring — compatible systems may use sensor information to monitor physical interaction and operating conditions.

Safe-state behavior — systems should be designed to stop, reduce force, or enter an appropriate safe state when abnormal conditions are detected.

Traceability — where appropriate, system events and interactions can be logged for review, improvement, and accountability.

Layered safety — hardware, software, sensors, operational procedures, and human supervision.

境界

安全保証ではありません。

Not a certification or regulatory approval.

Not a replacement for the Systems Safety Layer.

人による監督

人が安全境界を設定します。

人が重大な決定を承認します。

必要なとき人が介入します。

限界

いかなるシステムもすべてのリスクを排除しません。

リスクとコンテキストは時間とともに変化することがあります。

No technology can guarantee prevention of falls or injury.

対象範囲

Development priorities and governance.

検証済み製品は主張されません。

安全の結果は約束されません。

信頼ページは、組織的コミットメント、ガバナンス、限界を説明します。法的方針、認証、完全な安全・プライバシー・コンプライアンスの保証ではありません。